Tell a Friend


My perspective on the UFO phenomenon by NORIO HAYAKAWA

Posted by Darshana Sanrakshak Shambhala on February 10, 2011 at 6:27am in First Contact

E-mail: noriohayakawa@rocketmail.com
November 14, 2010
My perspective on the UFO phenomenon is based on the propositions made by both Dr. Jacques Vallee and Tomas Scolarici (a.k.a., James Black):
1. "The things we call unidentified flying objects are neither objects nor flying. They can materialize, as some reliable photographs seem to show, and they violate the laws of motion as we know them".(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

2. "Those unidentified flying objects that remain UNIDENTIFIED and challenge any natural definition, are not a new phenomenon.These "Entities" are with us from the beginning of our historical times, and perhaps before." (QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).
"UFOs have been seen throughout history and have consistently received (or provided) their own explanation within the framework of each culture.In antiquity their occupants were regarded as gods; in medieval times, as magicians; in the nineteenth century, as scientific geniuses; in our own time, as interplanetary travelers.(Statements made by occupants of the 1897 airship included such declarations as 'We are from Kansas' and even 'We are from anywhere....but we'll be in Greece tomorrow')"(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

3. "UFO reports are not necessarily caused by visits from space travelers. The phenomenon could be a manifestation of a much more complex technology. If time and space are not as simple in structure as physicists have assumed until now, then the question 'Where do they come from?' may be meaningless; they could come from a place in time. If consciousness can be manifested outside the body, then the range of hypotheses can be even wider."(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)
"The extraterrestrial hypothesis is not satisfactory at all. The time travelers hypothesis about UFOs, is better than the extraterrestrial one, but in no way answers all our questions".(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

4) "The key to an understanding of the phenomenon lies in the psychic effects it produces (or the psychic awareness it makes possible) in its observers.Their lives are often deeply changed, and they develop unusual talents with which they may find it difficult to cope.The proportion of witnesses who do come forward and publish accounts of these experiences is quite low; most of them choose to remain silent".(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

5) "Contact between human percipients and the UFO phenomenon always occurs under conditions controlled by the latter. Its characteristic feature is a factor of absurdity that leads to a rejection of the story by the upper layers of the target society and an absorption at a deep unconscious level of the symbols conveyed by the encounter.The mechanism of this resonance between the UFO symbol and the archetypes of the human unconscious has been abundantly demonstrated by Carl Jung, whose book FLYING SAUCERS makes many references to the age-old significance of the signs in the sky".(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)
"The UFO phenomenon COEXISTS with us, humans.The UFO phenomenon is with us, was with our ancestors and will be in the future without changes.These "Entities" have no need, or are not interested, or cannot openly contact us"(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

6) "It's possible that the complexity of the UFO phenomenon makes any understanding impossible.Nobody knows what the UFO phenomenon is, and probably we will never know more"(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

7) "The UFO phenomenon is not a threat to our security.The same phenomenon neither was a threat for the Sumerians or Romans, or Indians".(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).
8) "There is no such thing as a cover-up, and the authorities know as little about the nature of the UFO phenomenon as ourselves.They learned however that the UFO phenomenon is not a threat for our Security".(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

I am in total agreement with both Dr. Jacques Vallee and Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black.Yes, they summarize my personal position on the entire UFO phenomenon.This is the reason why, in my opinion, there will be no such thing as DISCLOSURE by the government.Sure, the governments of the world could release ALL files on UFO sightings anytime, if they wish to.However, just releasing such files will do absolutely nothing, since the public will clamor for the explanations as to what the UFO phenomenon is.The government is only responsible for explaining things that deal with physical, tangible, solid, empirical evidence as we know them.Anything else, the governmet is not in the business of dealing with.If there will be any DISCLOSURE, it will come directly from the "Entities" themselves or from a paradigm-shifted majority of mankind (which has not happened yet).
NORIO HAYAKAWA http://noriohayakawa2012.blogspot.com/
Norio Hayakawahttp://www.facebook.com/norio.hayakawa
P.S.
Although some people may label me as a UFO skeptic, I have never been (and will never be) a UFO debunker.
I have researched the phenomenon for more than 45 years, and although it seems (at least to me) that there appears to be no physical, tangible, irrefutable evidence whatsoever that we have ever been visited by physical extraterrestrials in physical UFOs, I have never been (and will never be) a debunker.
The UFO phenomenon and the "belief in UFOs" (as physical spacecraft piloted or maneuvered by physical aliens from elsewhere in the universe) are separate matters.
It is highly likely that the U.S. intelligence communities as well as the military have manipulated (and in some instances even created) a segment of the population's "belief in UFOs" as part of counter intelligence operations. Many defense contractors still continue to create cover stories to conceal or detract attention away from public's scrutiny of sensitive defense programs.Yes, people's "belief in UFOs" is a very important factor in all of this.
What about alien visitations?As most UFO enthusiasts have heard already, theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking (one of the most brilliant minds of our time) recently made several statements suggesting that there OUGHT to be extraterrestrial life and civilization elsewhere in this vast universe.
But he also made a puzzling statement (a statement which has not been popular with most UFO enthusiasts) saying that "aliens have never visited earth in UFOs and will never visit earth in UFOs".
Here is what he said: "I discount suggestions that UFOs contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant."
"What is the explanation of why we have not been visited? One possibility is that the argument about the appearance of life on Earth, is wrong. Maybe the probability of life spontaneously appearing is so low, that Earth is the only planet in the galaxy, or in the observable universe, in which it happened. Another possibility is that there was a reasonable probability of forming self reproducing systems, like cells, but that most of these forms of life did not evolve intelligence."
"I am discounting reports of UFOs".So, basically, Stephen Hawking thinks aliens exist somewhere in the universe but doesn't believe any are visiting us.
Stephen Hawking is not only skeptical about UFOs but also about alien abductions.
Yes, it is true that I consider myself a UFO skeptic when it comes to alien visitations.I was a strong proponent of the E.T. hypothesis of the origins of UFOs up till the late 1970s when I began to abandon that theory. That was when I became a UFO skeptic.But I consider myself a "healthy" skeptic.That is to say, my policy is to give an opportunity to any sincere researcher to express their viewpoints, even if I may not agree with them.
Do I believe in the existence of "underground bases"?Yes, certainly I believe that there may be "underground bases", large and small, in many locations but personally I tend to believe that those are government/military/scientific installations or laboratories that have nothing to do with aliens.I still maintain that if, for example, the alleged Dulce underground installations in New Mexico really exist, they would most likely be related to the U.S. government's biological warfare research facilities.However, as difficult as this may be for me to say, I do not rule out anything.
Yes, "healthy" skepticism is very important because it does not completely leave the door closed.The door must be kept open, even slightly, for any possibility.I am a believer in open platforms so that people with other viewpoints could freely express their opinions.

NORIO HAYAKAWA